This is my personal experience, from first to last
were addressed to me I tried to speak to Jack The Ripper. If you know, you can see how this kid acts and opinions for yourself if applied to the examples that he preaches.
words, this is a story in two voices:
yours and mine
. If you are interested, read it, and
reasons for you opinion.
begin from the beginning: I learned of the existence of such a Jack The Ripper
in the comments of a blog I visit often , in which two teenagers were talking about this character, one made known their negative experience with him and the other defended him. A few comments came on the scene the very Jack The Ripper to attack that had an unfavorable opinion toward him. Out of curiosity, I visited the blog of this Jack. After reading a blog entries of this character in lambasting one of "his
trolls" (click here to read
, which I consider necessary before proceeding with my case), I ventured to post a comment valuing what seemed to me that show (for this are the comments, right?). Step
transcribe, as such, the commentary said:
First, hello.
First let me perfectly clear that this matter or I will not come to me, and certainly it should not even take part. But I see a lot of inconsistencies, and that, Jack (and now I am writing to you), knowing that many people follow you, is (at least) to take into account. And given my total impartiality in this set, I thought it right to qualify a couple of details:
1. " I blame them, I laugh at them with originality and intelligence " . No, Jack, called dumb ***** vetarle someone and is not original, much less intelligent. In fact, I see much more than that you claim in the "campaign" generated by the other individual.
2. " is As I know it's all day in my blog I knew I was going to swallow my whole video video-picking and thus bring an action against me that would publicize my web " . Tell me what is the difference between that and what have you done here, because I do not see it.
3. And yes, you're also advertising to it (in fact, I've encouraged to seek-and-find information on the above). At the moment obviously be "large" or "small", that also deserves analysis.
With the same intention to remain unbiased, I leave saying (not without daring act) that, if you intend to talk about serious issues (the impact that can have), you should take it with a bit of seriousness.
course, is only an opinion, which, incidentally, claims to be free of acrimony.
could say many things, but I think this is no time or place.
Greetings.
After a few minutes (no more than it has cost you read this far), the comment was deleted
; thing that caught me by surprise.
was convinced it had not violated any standards (
click here to see them) that Mr. Jack imposed (with all the right in the world, of course) on his blog. So, as noted at the end of those rules, I walked away from its contacts with the message that follows (verbatim):
Well, as you ask is here that demand explanations of why is cleared comment, that's what I expect: an explanation. Have you ever been to "tone master", perhaps? That itself is ambiguous.
I think it will be necessary to express my total outrage ...
I expect a prompt response, if possible.
response (via e-mail) is not made to wait long, and was, without changing a comma, this:
My answer is that your relationship with others is more than evident. If you have any complaints over Complain to your blog or talk by mail. Do you think you know it better? What you're a crack?
Forward, if so show me why you do brag. It is as if I entered your blog and I echo the anger because you have very, few visitors. Puzzled
I stayed, and so I stated in my next post, which, I repeat, transcribe faithfully:
Pardon? I do not understand your tone at all, but I feel obliged to point out a few things (yes, I like it well):
1. No, I have no connection with the "other." Subjective evidence of the fair, because you are curtailing freedom of expression (which is not offensive or disrespectful, or much less).
2. My "complaint" (you call it that) was to you and it is fair to do it in a place they have access (and what better place than your blog, with more reason that comes in the wake of one of your posts?) .
3. do not think I said anything to make it better or be a crack. Will I see you like that?
4. I presume? When? Where?
5. What does my blog and your visitors?
Well, in the end have been more questions than clarifications. If you are so kind, I would read the answers.
Greetings.
The answer this time I took some (a lot) more. And the following (I simply copy and paste):
Why do I have to answer any of your questions?
Yes, that I thought, and that's what I know:
Wait, wait ... who do you think you are?
not have to answer, but should do, mainly for education. Secondly, because you yourself have said "If you have any complaints over Complain to your blog or talk by mail" (after deleting my comment, I remind you) and pretend that: speaking by mail. And thirdly they are questions regarding a bid (say ...) "attack" on your part.
no answer good enough to refute you do not intend to grant immunity.
I'm still waiting.
In his defense, saying only:
pfffffffffff
Adios kid.
And my answer was:
I just show the kind of person you are. Lord guru self-help, you leave much to be desired.
Subsequently, as no other medium in which to address Jack The Ripper (since he had denied me the right to comment on his blog and did not respond to e-mail) I decided to make my experience in the blog comments
aforementioned . There
you answered yes, and he did as follows:
Why Do not believe an anti-fan club Jack the Ripper and leave me alone?
As you can label me immoral nene_weno, when you copy a private email without permission. Do not see the contradiction is?
What are you going to demand from private mails you when you copy an unknown blog?
addition to asking me explanations and do not know who the fuck you are. Why should I explain to a guy who does not know of anything?
seemed so ridiculous that you did and wanted me to respond I spent oblivious to you.
If you go down the street and a guy to you and asks you
Hey, where are you? Why have run with that? How much desire a month? You
you respond, I do not ... I do not give explanations to a stranger that neither me or I will come.
Webmail is the time to comment here, princpalmente because I do not see sense of this dispute and because we used to Jabagood create curiosity and top 2 or 3 visits.
Something I see little moral on your part. I do not agree on my blog this absurd dispute, or to insult anyone just to create controversy and visits.
for me just want to say the deep disappointment and low morale that gives me the administrator and I have been even more DONKEY by entering the scrubbing and being a puppet in this circus.
I like to discuss things with respect, you guys insult me \u200b\u200bfree, private email and copied the administrator aware everything to create curiosity and up visits.
Anyway, I find it pathetic that I swear and promise not to go further in this type of disuptas absurd. And the blame for all the teno I not you, by getting into this crap and disuptas absurd, but balls. A Hug
As you can imagine, I, with the reality of the facts before I replied (as long without changing a single letter):
You expose your opinion publicly on a blog. I read that review and comment. Surprise: the comment is not a compliment, but a critique (with all the education in the world, and more), and is deleted.
I have not asked how much they charge (or, much less how), but with * why you deleted my comment . That is the explanation that I ordered.
course the e-mail is private. Actually belongs to my privacy. My privacy and I expose it whenever and wherever I please (... and let me do it).
They will not serve any such absurd pretexts.
"People who charges 30 € for 30 minutes MSN coach (telita you, uncle) also tell them" I ask A ME MI explanations and not even know WHO who the fuck you " ?
... Now tell me what time I have isultado.
There remains the thing (or so I thought). The so Jack The Ripper remained without commenting. Until a few hours later, published an entry on his blog making clear allusions to the events of those comments referred to above (here you can read it:
Part 1 and Part 2
). I will refrain from commenting on the post title ...
Obviously, as part indirectly lied in the content of your post, I wanted to give my opinion in a commentary, which was as follows:
Well, innuendo (and if you let me this time) I would say only two things
Why not put a link to the "discussion" in question so that everyone can see it and think for themselves? Since such detailed analysis has made it and where (that I understood) with such good grace you have acted, I think it would be appropriate.
" ... Even though you have every reason in the world will leave your unused words and maybe you deleted a post, because if so " . " I allow someone to criticize or contradict me with education " . Jack, honestly, tell me if this is not a complete contradiction in your attitude toward me, the last (and first) time you were addressed to me.
Again, without bitterness.
Greetings.
If you expected to delete my comment, the story will not disappoint: After a few minutes awaiting moderation
, my comment was deleted again (2 of 2 ...), and I returned to resort to "contacts"
Okay, Jack, very well ...
should be the first to preach to your examples.
What does he say? Lee, who does not have any waste (not change anything):
try to put my readers against me. Why heck I'll let you do that?
Where do you get that idea? Really I understand something like that in my comment? I reply:
What? If you are your readers, it will be for something.
What we do intend (and try to be as clear as possible to avoid potential misunderstandings) is to see the facts as they are, not just like you the samples, saying themselves.
If you are afraid that they are made against you, there must be, Jack.
As you have seen, I always go straight and try to be as objective and unbiased as possible ... But you put me to express difficult choice.
And the explanation that I appeared on the blog Jabogood (all times staying on the sidelines of the "dispute" manteníais already, I do not care) was, as you well know, by denying my opinion no reason.
me if what I said in my comment in your blog (the second to deny me) is something inconsiderate.
This has been his argument:
answer Pass ... simply feel sorry. Cn I'm not that frustrated you must pay your life. Just that.
Yes, what you see: personal attacks (I did not invent anything.) My answer, a mixture of perplexity and indignation, was this:
How?
Hahaha. This is really good.
No, no answer raisins. What actually happens is that you can not (o, quizá, no sabes). Sencillamente no tienes motivo ni argumentos.
Vuelvo a repetir (y ya van...) que me dirigí a ti con respeto y educación. Has sido tú quien, al borrar mi comentario, has incentivado a que esta conversación degenere en lo que es actualmente. Y, no contento con ello, te niegas a razonar y (para más inri) pretendes ofender.
Como última respuesta, el señor Jack dijo:
jajaja. ¿No tienes nada más que hacer?
Que fácil es tocar los cojones cuando tienes un blog de mierda como el tuyo. No me marees más niñato, que tengo trabajo.
¿Qué tiene que ver mi blog (obviamente, no se refiere this, at that time or was)? I do not know. Why focus all their efforts in bringing the issue of blogs (which he just referred to)? No idea. What is clear out trying to talk to this person? Nothing
.
[Jack The Ripper Lord , as both insist on the topic: Your blog is not as big as you and your ego pretendéis see. Other blogs, not yours, not
"bogs of shit" . And above all, I do not cheat
anyone (not even try). By the way, do not strive to gloat in your blog of "advertising" that you do (I know you're interested in are the visits); In fact, the purpose of this place is that you discover as many people as possible.
] do not intend at any time inculcaros my opinion, much less. I merely state, being completely faithful to the facts (as quoted here as it is copied
), who is this kid really. Now's your turn to say
and decide.
We 
concerning this post) with the "courage" that characterizes him, without naming, quoting, or given the option to opine that people beyond their release. 
(Test within the cultural complex) 
(in conversation with the Director of the Museum) 
(interacting with people from the community) 
(back to the cultural complex) 
(playing on the roof) 
(Piss Christ, 1987) 
